• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Fat Tail Daily

Investment Ideas From the Edge of the Bell Curve

  • Menu
    • Commodities
      • Resources and Mining
      • Copper
      • Gold
      • Iron Ore
      • Lithium
      • Silver
      • Graphite
      • Rare Earths
    • Technology
      • AI
      • Bitcoin
      • Cryptocurrency
      • Energy
      • Financial Technology
      • Bio Technology
    • Market Analysis
      • Latest ASX News
      • Dividend Shares
      • ETFs
      • Stocks and Bonds
    • Macro
      • Australian Economy
      • Central Banks
      • World Markets
    • Small Caps
    • More
      • Investment Guides
      • Premium Research
      • Editors
      • About
      • Contact Us
  • Latest
  • Fat Tail Series
  • About Us
Latest

Who will Win the Election? — The Man with the Keys to the White House

Like 0

By Jim Rickards, Thursday, 01 October 2020

Dear Reader,

Ever heard of Allan Lichtman? He created ‘The Keys to the White House’ model, which uses 13 True/False criteria to predict whether the candidate of an incumbent party will win or lose the next US presidential election.

Below, Jim Rickards applies the model to Trump as he seeks to reclaim the White House in November. According to Jim, Trump has nine ‘True’ ratings and only four ‘False’.

So, what does that mean? Read on to find out…

Until next time,

Shae Russell Signature

Shae Russell,
Editor, The Daily Reckoning Australia

[conversion type=”in_post”]

The Man with the Keys to the White House

In a previous edition of The Daily Reckoning Australia, I spoke about the model I use to predict who will win the next US presidential election. I used this model to accurately predict a Trump victory in 2016.

Another model that is considered to have more predictive power than most other models or polls was invented by Professor Allan Lichtman of American University, with a collaborator.

This model is referred to as ‘The Keys to the White House’. It consists of 13 factors (called ‘keys’), which can be applied to the party in power to yield binary true or false answers. If the party in power gets at least eight true answers, they win the election. If the party in power gets seven or fewer true answers, they lose the election. That’s it.

Finding the keys

Here are the 13 keys according to Lichtman:

  1. The incumbent party holds more seats in the House after the most recent mid-term election than it did in the previous mid-term election.
  2. The incumbent did not face a serious challenge for the nomination.
  3. The incumbent party candidate is the sitting president.
  4. There is no significant third-party challenger.
  5. The economy is not in recession during the election campaign.
  6. Real annual per capita GDP growth during the president’s term exceeds mean growth during the prior two terms.
  7. The incumbent party effects major changes in national policy.
  8. There is no sustained social unrest during the incumbent’s term.
  9. The incumbent is untainted by major scandal.
  10. The incumbent administration suffers no major failure in foreign or military affairs.
  11. The incumbent administration achieves a major success in foreign or military affairs.
  12. The incumbent party candidate is charismatic or a national hero.
  13. The challenging party candidate is not charismatic or a national hero.

Part of the attraction of this model is that it does not depend on polls, conventions, debates, or the notorious ‘October surprise’. In fact, this model can produce accurate forecasts as much as a year in advance of the election because many of the questions posed can be answered definitively far in advance of election day.

The problem is that these questions don’t always have accurate answers, or answers that easily escape selective biases based on partisan perspectives. Trump may seem charismatic to his blue-collar fans and supporters, but may seem merely buffoonish to his college-educated urban detractors. Still, you have to answer the questions in order for the model to produce results.

So, how does Trump score?

With those challenges in mind (and a strong dose of humility), here are the answers:

  1. False. (Republicans lost control of the House in 2018.)
  2. True. (Trump had no primary challengers.)
  3. True. (Trump is a sitting president.)
  4. True. (There is no significant third-party challenge in 2020.)
  5. False. (The economy began a new recession in February 2020.)
  6. False. (Growth from 2017–20 will be less than 2009–12 and 2013–16.)
  7. True. (Trump has achieved major tax, trade, immigration and prison reforms.)
  8. False. (There has been major social unrest starting in May 2020.)
  9. True. (Trump has been accused of many scandals, but the accusations are false.)
  10. True. (There have been no major foreign policy failures.)
  11. True. (The Israeli–UAE peace treaty is a world historic achievement.)
  12. True. (Trump must be regarded as charismatic even though he is widely disliked.)
  13. True. (Joe Biden is no hero and is one of the least charismatic figures on the scene.)

9/13 is good enough

Based on these answers, Trump has nine ‘True’ ratings and only four ‘False’ ratings. According to Lichtman’s rules, if the incumbent party gets eight or more True ratings, they win. At least under this interpretation of Lichtman’s Keys to the White House, Trump should be re-elected to a second term in office.

Of course, these answers are debatable. Some Trump critics might flip number 9 to False because of impeachment and number 12 to False on the ‘Trump is a buffoon’ theory. The answer to number 11 is certainly True, but it has not received that much attention despite its importance.

It’s also not clear how robust Lichtman’s model is at a time when the country is experiencing the worst pandemic in over 100 years and the worst depression in over 80 years. It’s true that the economy is in a recession (number 5), but the recession was due to the pandemic, not to any economic policies pursued by Trump.

If the public blames the pandemic and not Trump for the recession, then that factor might be less important than in times past. Likewise, the social unrest we are experiencing (number 8) arises under Democratic mayors and governors, and Trump is widely perceived as trying to stop it. A perception as a ‘Law and Order’ president could help Trump as it did George HW Bush in 1988.

My view is that the Lichtman model predicts a Trump victory, but the matter is not free from debate. Interestingly, Lichtman himself used his own model to predict a Biden victory, but that was before the Israel–UAE peace treaty, so Lichtman has number 11 as False. I publicly asked Lichtman if the peace deal would change his forecast but have not received a reply.

Under any interpretation, the model predicts a close election. If Lichtman’s original application of the model (as a predictor of popular votes rather than electoral votes) still applies, and allowing for Lichtman’s view that Biden will win, it could certainly be the case that Biden would prevail in the popular vote while once again Trump wins the electoral college and wins the White House. That would come as no surprise.

All the best,

Jim Rickards Signature

Jim Rickards,
Strategist, The Daily Reckoning Australia

PS: Aussie Gold Miner Stocks: Free report reveals why Australia is set to become the next ‘gold epicentre’ — which could result in a HUGE spike in Aussie gold stock prices. Click here to learn more.

All advice is general advice and has not taken into account your personal circumstances.

Please seek independent financial advice regarding your own situation, or if in doubt about the suitability of an investment.

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jim Rickards

Jim’s Premium Subscriptions

Publication logo
Jim Rickards’ Strategic Intelligence

Latest Articles

  • Australia ain’t the USA…and that’s great!
    By Callum Newman

    The outlook for Australia and the ASX are very different to the US and US shares. Here’s why…

  • The biggest infrastructure spending boom in history just kicked off
    By Nick Hubble

    Did governments screw up our gas supply? According to some sources in the industry, a rather similar thing happened to our electricity and water industry.

  • You Read it Here First: Great Asset Rotation Underway
    By James Cooper

    Media is swirling on the great asset transition taking place from the banks to the miners. But James Cooper made this prediction months ago in Mining Memo. Are you taking advantage?

Primary Sidebar

Latest Articles

  • Australia ain’t the USA…and that’s great!
  • The biggest infrastructure spending boom in history just kicked off
  • You Read it Here First: Great Asset Rotation Underway
  • The sector primed to fly into 2026
  • OpenAI and Microsoft Divorce?: Why this could be good for you

Footer

Fat Tail Daily Logo
YouTube
Facebook
x (formally twitter)
LinkedIn

About

Investment ideas from the edge of the bell curve.

Go beyond conventional investing strategies with unique ideas and actionable opportunities. Our expert editors deliver conviction-led insights to guide your financial journey.

Quick Links

Subscribe

About

FAQ

Terms and Conditions

Financial Services Guide

Privacy Policy

Get in Touch

Contact Us

Email: support@fattail.com.au

Phone: 1300 667 481

All advice is general in nature and has not taken into account your personal circumstances. Please seek independent financial advice regarding your own situation, or if in doubt about the suitability of an investment.

The value of any investment and the income derived from it can go down as well as up. Never invest more than you can afford to lose and keep in mind the ultimate risk is that you can lose whatever you’ve invested. While useful for detecting patterns, the past is not a guide to future performance. Some figures contained in our reports are forecasts and may not be a reliable indicator of future results. Any actual or potential gains in these reports may not include taxes, brokerage commissions, or associated fees.

Fat Tail Logo

Fat Tail Daily is brought to you by the team at Fat Tail Investment Research

Copyright © 2025 Fat Tail Daily | ACN: 117 765 009 / ABN: 33 117 765 009 / ASFL: 323 988