• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Fat Tail Daily

Investment Ideas From the Edge of the Bell Curve

  • Menu
    • Commodities
      • Resources and Mining
      • Copper
      • Gold
      • Iron Ore
      • Lithium
      • Silver
      • Graphite
      • Rare Earths
    • Technology
      • AI
      • Bitcoin
      • Cryptocurrency
      • Energy
      • Financial Technology
      • Bio Technology
    • Market Analysis
      • Latest ASX News
      • Dividend Shares
      • ETFs
      • Stocks and Bonds
    • Macro
      • Australian Economy
      • Central Banks
      • World Markets
    • Small Caps
    • More
      • Investment Guides
      • Premium Research
      • Editors
      • About
      • Contact Us
  • Latest
  • Fat Tail Series
  • About Us
Latest

Was It the Worst Year Ever for Investors?

Like 0

By Nick Hubble, Saturday, 07 January 2023

You might’ve seen articles that it was the second or fourth worst year, depending on the political leanings of the newspaper you read. As ever, it’s a game of picking and choosing numbers to get the conclusions you want.

Inflation has lain dormant for so long that even the stock market statisticians have forgotten they need to adjust investment returns for it. Or perhaps they just want to avoid concluding the obvious in public. That it was the worst year ever for investors.

You might’ve seen articles that it was the second or fourth worst year, depending on the political leanings of the newspaper you read. As ever, it’s a game of picking and choosing numbers to get the conclusions you want.

Given my penchant for Funniest Home Videos and the like, you can guess I enjoy a bit of morbid humour. And financial markets certainly delivered that in 2022. But was it really the worst year ever?

Sort of…

Here’s the cherry-picking filter I’ve used to get to my own preferred conclusion…

First of all, I’m focusing on American investors’ experience investing in US markets. Why? Because that’s the only statistic by which the year really was such a record-breaking debacle.

Aussie investors in the US market might notice that their assets didn’t go down nearly as much as the media dramatised. The difference is the exchange rate. The US dollar surged, so Aussie investors’ currency gains offset some of the US markets’ losses.

You could even say that US stocks and bonds didn’t really crash particularly horrifically in 2022. Instead, it was the US dollar that surged. That pushed down US prices.

Think of it like this: if the definition of a centimetre changed from 10 millimetres to 11 or 12, then the size of everything would suddenly be a lot smaller…to the extent that we use centimetres to measure it.

In much the same way, the US dollar, the global measuring stick for prices, surged almost 20% to September but then corrected down so that it only finished the year up about 10%. This change caused chaos in USD prices because the unit of measurement changed. It was suddenly worth more.

Aussie investors looking at their AUD-denominated investments in the US likely didn’t notice much shift. Because the rising US dollar offset their losses in terms of Aussie dollars.

US investors weren’t so lucky. They weren’t protected by the US dollar’s surge in foreign exchange markets. And so bore the full brunt of falling asset prices instead.

So that’s the first filter I’m using to reach my conclusion that it was the worst year ever for investors — US assets as measured for US investors.

The second filter for my ‘the worst year ever’ claim is that I’m focusing on a 60/40 portfolio — the cookie of the cookie-cutting financial advice industry. This model portfolio, espoused by assets-under-management-compensated professionals, is a 60% allocation to stocks and 40% to bonds.

The idea is that when risky stocks have a bad year, safe bonds will go up instead. Thus, an allocation to bonds and stocks combined adds stability to the overall portfolio but still offers good returns (for those collecting the fees).

As you age, you’re supposed to add more bonds to make the portfolio even safer. Except, of course, that 2022 was the year in which bonds proved to be not safe at all. And, worst of all, this came to light in a year when stocks plunged too.

While US stocks plunged 19% in 2022, US Government bonds were down about 15%, depending on which ones you measure.

This is an extremely rare combination. In fact, the whole premise of the 60/40 portfolio is that this combination won’t happen. Stocks and bonds are supposed to be negatively correlated. Bonds are supposed to save you from bad years in the stock market and vice versa.

The only other time in the last century when US Government bonds fell by double digits was 2009, when the stock market began an epic recovery, offsetting those bond losses as they’re supposed to.

As I won’t bother digging into below, most of the other disastrous returns for the 60/40 portfolio featured years when stocks crashed so badly that mediocre returns in the bond market didn’t offset the losses. But 2022 was different in that both stocks and bonds fell, dramatically worsening the overall performance of a 60/40 portfolio.

So that’s filter two — the 60/40 portfolio and its failure in 2022. A failure which comes in at a return of -17% for the year for Americans investing in US assets.

Filter three is an especially awkward one. It’s the calendar year.

You see, 2022’s plunges coincided quite nicely with the calendar year. This makes things very convenient if I’m trying to claim that it was the worst year ever, right?

Other crashes might’ve started at the end of 2007 and finished in 2009, splitting the chaos into three separate years, dramatically reducing how bad the crash looks if you compare the calendar years separately.

A 2022-type crash that begins in July and ends in June might not even register on the list of record breakers as measured by calendar years.

But 2022’s crashes timed things nicely for my purposes today. The peak was in the final days of 2021, and the Santa rally of 2022 faded, even if we didn’t finish on the lows of 2022.

Compare the performance of an American’s 60/40 portfolio during other 12-month periods and you might come up with completely different conclusions to the one I reach today…

Even then, 12 months is arbitrary too…

As you can tell by now, advertising the good or bad performance of investment assets is surprisingly easy…

But it’s adding in inflation which everyone else seems to have missed. And my fourth filter is what makes things especially miserable…for US investors…who bought into a 60/40 portfolio…in January 2022 and sold it all in December 2022…

Using all the same constraints except inflation, the website A Wealth of Common Sense calculated that the drop in stocks and bonds was the third worst year for a 60/40 portfolio since the 1920s. First and second place go to the Great Depression’s 27% and 20%. To this, we compare our 60/40 portfolio’s performance of -17%.

Not quite as bad, but still in third place, right?

But wait, what about the 7% inflation Americans experienced in 2022? That’d make their real return -24%. Still only in second place? Not once did you adjust for deflation during the Great Depression…

According to the Minneapolis Federal Reserve, US inflation in 1931 was -8.9%.

No doubt this sounds apocalyptic…if you have an education in economics and your spouse does the shopping. For the rest of us, falling prices are quite good. They left the US 60/40 investors with an 18% loss in real terms in 1931, for example.

Which is a lot less dramatic than the 24% losses of 2022.

And so, yes, 2022 really was the worst year ever for investors. US investors holding a 60/40 portfolio for the calendar year, that is. Those who held tech stocks or more risky bonds did even worse.

But that’s hardly my point, isn’t it? My point is that such figures likely reflect the bias of the person using them more than the experienced reality of…you.

And that’s inherently so. There is no way to present entirely accurate or relevant figures. We must use arbitrary ones. But please do remember to keep those distinctions in mind. They might be determining the conclusions.

Until next time,

Nick Hubble Signature

Nickolai Hubble,
Editor, The Daily Reckoning Australia Weekend

All advice is general advice and has not taken into account your personal circumstances.

Please seek independent financial advice regarding your own situation, or if in doubt about the suitability of an investment.

Nick Hubble

Nick Hubble found us at Fat Tail Investment Research in 2010 after a stint inside Wall Street’s most notorious bank, Goldman Sachs, during the 2008 GFC. That’s where he saw the true nature of the investment banking business. Since then, he’s been the editor of the Daily Reckoning Australia and the UK-based Fortune & Freedom and Gold Stock Fortunes.

He’s delighted to work as Investment Director and Editor for Jim Rickards’ Strategic Intelligence Australia. Here he helps turn Jim’s big-picture views into specific actionable advice and ideas for Australian investors.

Nick’s Premium Subscriptions

Publication logo
Jim Rickards’ Strategic Intelligence

Latest Articles

  • Lion Clock says buy now for the big pay off later
    By Callum Newman

    Now is the time to be investing and following into this sector. According to the Lion investment clock, now’s the time to scoop up what you can and surf the rising liquidity wave.

  • Cashflow Gems: Focus on Mining Juniors That Own the Golden Goose
    By James Cooper

    Exploration success hinges on continuous drilling, and self-funding juniors have the edge. Discover how these companies leverage cash flow to advance projects without pausing, while their cash-strapped competitors face hibernation.

  • Tick, tock: there’s a boom brewing in one sector…
    By Callum Newman

    All the old hands say you’re supposed to buy resources when they’re down in the dumps. That’s the theory. It’s the timing that’s the bitch. Here’s some help with that…

Primary Sidebar

Latest Articles

  • Lion Clock says buy now for the big pay off later
  • Cashflow Gems: Focus on Mining Juniors That Own the Golden Goose
  • Tick, tock: there’s a boom brewing in one sector…
  • Buy oil when there’s peace in the streets
  • Vicuña: The Greatest Mineral Discovery of Our Lifetime

Footer

Fat Tail Daily Logo
YouTube
Facebook
x (formally twitter)
LinkedIn

About

Investment ideas from the edge of the bell curve.

Go beyond conventional investing strategies with unique ideas and actionable opportunities. Our expert editors deliver conviction-led insights to guide your financial journey.

Quick Links

Subscribe

About

FAQ

Terms and Conditions

Financial Services Guide

Privacy Policy

Get in Touch

Contact Us

Email: support@fattail.com.au

Phone: 1300 667 481

All advice is general in nature and has not taken into account your personal circumstances. Please seek independent financial advice regarding your own situation, or if in doubt about the suitability of an investment.

The value of any investment and the income derived from it can go down as well as up. Never invest more than you can afford to lose and keep in mind the ultimate risk is that you can lose whatever you’ve invested. While useful for detecting patterns, the past is not a guide to future performance. Some figures contained in our reports are forecasts and may not be a reliable indicator of future results. Any actual or potential gains in these reports may not include taxes, brokerage commissions, or associated fees.

Fat Tail Logo

Fat Tail Daily is brought to you by the team at Fat Tail Investment Research

Copyright © 2025 Fat Tail Daily | ACN: 117 765 009 / ABN: 33 117 765 009 / ASFL: 323 988