• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Fat Tail Daily

Investment Ideas From the Edge of the Bell Curve

  • Menu
    • Commodities
      • Resources and Mining
      • Copper
      • Gold
      • Iron Ore
      • Lithium
      • Silver
      • Graphite
      • Rare Earths
    • Technology
      • AI
      • Bitcoin
      • Cryptocurrency
      • Energy
      • Financial Technology
      • Bio Technology
    • Market Analysis
      • Latest ASX News
      • Dividend Shares
      • ETFs
      • Stocks and Bonds
    • Macro
      • Australian Economy
      • Central Banks
      • World Markets
    • Small Caps
    • More
      • Investment Guides
      • Premium Research
      • Editors
      • About
      • Contact Us
  • Latest
  • Fat Tail Series
  • About Us
Latest

Have We Hit the Max Tax Threshold?

Like 0

By Nick Hubble, Friday, 11 October 2024

At some point, hiking taxes actually cuts revenue. And then the spending cuts must begin. The UK may have hit the threshold already. Investors should watch for the consequences.

Something very odd just happened in UK politics. The government bumped their head on an imaginary threshold. And it’s sending a jarring warning right through parliaments and markets around the world.

Bloomberg has the details:

‘When Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves plotted Labour’s path to power in the UK, they banked on eye-catching moves to hike taxes on private equity and ultra-rich “non-dom” residents to fund key spending plans. Now, those promises are meeting reality.

‘Reeves is reviewing how to implement both pledges because of internal Treasury analysis which says the moves could end up costing the exchequer money, rather than raising upwards of £5 billion ($6.6 billion) over the parliamentary term.’

Raising taxes could bring in less revenue? Can you imagine how that’d change politics?

This is not a new idea, of course. Academics call it the Laffer Curve, named after the economist Arthur Laffer.

He pointed out that tax hikes from low levels of tax raise lots of additional revenue. But the more you hike taxes, the less additional revenue you get. That’s because high taxes change habits. The higher the tax, the bigger the incentive to avoid it. People emigrate, shut down their business, join the grey economy and lots more.

At some point, hiking taxes actually cuts overall revenue. The response from taxpayers shirking outweighs the revenue raised from those taxpayers who allow themselves to be bled like Medieval medical patients.

Fat Tail Investment Research

Source: Bastianowa, Wiki Commons

But all of this was supposed to be theoretical. Something that pops up in speeches by fringe economists and their even fringier one-term political counterparts.

When the Financial Times published an article that claimed, ‘Analysis of the UK Budget suggests revenue gains from tax cuts are vanishingly rare’, nobody panicked. The UK’s Labour Party ignored it.

But suddenly the UK government is discovering it may be a very real problem.

And the rest of us might not be far behind…

Governments may be offside on
the Laffer Curve

The UK Treasury’s warnings suggest the Brits have hit the theoretical threshold. It can’t raise more money by raising taxes. So, there is only one way left to deal with the dangerous debt and deficit: cut spending.

The thing is, the UK only raises slightly more taxes as a percent of GDP than Australia. And less than many other nations.

Admittedly, the UK’s new Labour government is being unusually stupid about who it taxes. They are trying to tax the sectors of the economy most likely to do a “John Galt” – give up and go elsewhere.

Taxing private school fees just shifts students into the public sector. Removing the tax loopholes used by “non-doms” just sends the one foot they kept in the UK overseas. Private equity is notoriously fleeting.

But the broader point still stands. The question is whether this is a warning for the rest of us. What if governments around the world are hitting tax thresholds that put them offside on the Laffer Curve?

What if raising taxes doesn’t result in
more revenue anymore?

We’ve all heard endless tales about overindebted governments around the world. Some of us have been going on about it for decades…

The long-term projections are dire, to say the least. The IMF is even warning our Treasurer about long term deficits and getting spending under control. This during a surplus.

We used to presume all this amounted to higher tax rates in the future. But if you were to presume that the stone has been bled dry already, the implications get mighty interesting…

We’d have to see a radical shift in government policy in coming decades. A prolonged period of government spending cuts. Something nobody considers likely.

That has huge implications for all of us. But this newsletter isn’t about how to maximise your Centrelink benefits in an age of austerity. It’s about how markets would be hit.

So, which sectors might be on the chopping block if governments have to tighten their belts instead of asking taxpayers to carry the burden?

1. Defence

Three new defence ETFs are getting listed on the ASX. If ever there was a sign of a trade gone mainstream, this is it.

And it’s no surprise given the state of geopolitics. We can only await President Biden’s Nobel Peace Prize.

The question is whether defence companies can handle a global budget crackdown. Given the choice between guns and butter, it’d take a lot of war to convince voters to favour guns. Just ask East Germany’s mainstream politicians.

A lot of foreign aid goes to buying weapons systems from the countries doing the giving. Remember when German bailout money was used by the Greeks to buy German submarines? The point being that a budget crackdown would undermine that sort of spending too.

I think the defence sector is vulnerable to being caught offside by the Laffer Curve.

2. Infrastructure

Demographic doom implies needing less infrastructure spending. With countries like Japan, South Korea and parts of Europe to experience outright population decline, governments are going to lose the excuse that justifies any infrastructure spending: projects always pay back if you just wait for long enough.

Transfer payments that build nothing for the future will be the priority. Especially amongst voters without children.

3. Healthcare

Australia is getting a global reputation for employing a higher share of its population in the healthcare sector than its peers. This is a mystery to me. We’ve never managed to see the same GP twice, but still get asked ‘who is your GP’ each time we visit a hospital. And most of the time, we can’t even understand what the GP is saying…

You might think that as the population ages, the healthcare budget will boom. But what if this burden is shifted onto private pockets to help shoulder the burden? What if the threshold of money the government is willing to spend to keep people alive is lowered?

The morally justified argument that any amount of money should be spent to save a life could come under fire if it is outright unaffordable. Highly expensive treatments could be left off the public sector’s list.

That’s already happening in many socialised healthcare systems around the world. And I’m not sure people will pay out of pocket when they discover the size of the bill that public sector coverage masked.

Change so slow only long-term
investors will notice

That’s three sectors of the stock market which could come under pressure if government spending becomes the lever by which governments manage their debts. As opposed to raising tax rates, which they’re used to doing.

This, by the way, runs contrary to much of the advice and recommendations you’ll find in Strategic Intelligence Australia. We’re positioned for an infrastructure spending boom on the back of Net Zero and a defence budget bonanza.

But those are medium term trends. We’re no Net Zero believers or neo-cons. And today’s Fat Tail Daily is about long-term trends.

No doubt our politicians will need to learn the hard way what the UK’s just discovered. So it’ll pay investors to watch how UK politics and markets unfold in coming years. We may be some ways behind in the race over the peak of the Laffer Curve, but we’re heading in the same direction.

Regards,

Nick Hubble Signature

Nick Hubble,
Editor, Strategic Intelligence Australia

All advice is general advice and has not taken into account your personal circumstances.

Please seek independent financial advice regarding your own situation, or if in doubt about the suitability of an investment.

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
guest
8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nick Hubble

Nick Hubble found us at Fat Tail Investment Research in 2010 after a stint inside Wall Street’s most notorious bank, Goldman Sachs, during the 2008 GFC. That’s where he saw the true nature of the investment banking business. Since then, he’s been the editor of the Daily Reckoning Australia and the UK-based Fortune & Freedom and Gold Stock Fortunes.

He’s delighted to work as Investment Director and Editor for Jim Rickards’ Strategic Intelligence Australia. Here he helps turn Jim’s big-picture views into specific actionable advice and ideas for Australian investors.

Nick’s Premium Subscriptions

Publication logo
Jim Rickards’ Strategic Intelligence

Latest Articles

  • America’s next Vietnam begins
    By Callum Newman

    I remember George W Bush on a US carrier declaring ‘Mission Accomplished’ when it came to Iraq in the second Gulf war. That was in 2003. The war was still going in 2011. Iraq became a failed state, instead of a flourishing democracy. The Iranians aren’t stupid.

  • Are we at war with China?
    By Nick Hubble

    Tariffs, fentanyl, the Straits of Hormuz, Canadian steel quotas and the EU admitting “Trump is right” all mean one thing: the West is finally taking on China.

  • Looking for the Catalyst: European Rearmament
    By James Cooper

    Every commodity cycle has a demand catalyst… James Cooper highlights one that few have paid attention to: conflict and military rearming. One of the primary drivers of higher metal prices. Read on to find out why this is important.

Primary Sidebar

Latest Articles

  • America’s next Vietnam begins
  • Are we at war with China?
  • Looking for the Catalyst: European Rearmament
  • An oil price spike is in the offing now
  • The Shopping Revolution No One Saw Coming

Footer

Fat Tail Daily Logo
YouTube
Facebook
x (formally twitter)
LinkedIn

About

Investment ideas from the edge of the bell curve.

Go beyond conventional investing strategies with unique ideas and actionable opportunities. Our expert editors deliver conviction-led insights to guide your financial journey.

Quick Links

Subscribe

About

FAQ

Terms and Conditions

Financial Services Guide

Privacy Policy

Get in Touch

Contact Us

Email: support@fattail.com.au

Phone: 1300 667 481

All advice is general in nature and has not taken into account your personal circumstances. Please seek independent financial advice regarding your own situation, or if in doubt about the suitability of an investment.

The value of any investment and the income derived from it can go down as well as up. Never invest more than you can afford to lose and keep in mind the ultimate risk is that you can lose whatever you’ve invested. While useful for detecting patterns, the past is not a guide to future performance. Some figures contained in our reports are forecasts and may not be a reliable indicator of future results. Any actual or potential gains in these reports may not include taxes, brokerage commissions, or associated fees.

Fat Tail Logo

Fat Tail Daily is brought to you by the team at Fat Tail Investment Research

Copyright © 2025 Fat Tail Daily | ACN: 117 765 009 / ABN: 33 117 765 009 / ASFL: 323 988