• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Fat Tail Daily

Investment Ideas From the Edge of the Bell Curve

  • Menu
    • Commodities
      • Resources and Mining
      • Copper
      • Gold
      • Iron Ore
      • Lithium
      • Silver
      • Graphite
      • Rare Earths
    • Technology
      • AI
      • Bitcoin
      • Cryptocurrency
      • Energy
      • Financial Technology
      • Bio Technology
    • Market Analysis
      • Latest ASX News
      • Dividend Shares
      • ETFs
      • Stocks and Bonds
    • Macro
      • Australian Economy
      • Central Banks
      • World Markets
    • Small Caps
    • More
      • Investment Guides
      • Premium Research
      • Editors
      • About
      • Contact Us
  • Latest
  • Fat Tail Series
  • About Us
No Index

American Life: Less Ordinary

Like 8

By Bill Bonner, Wednesday, 03 December 2025

It’s a poverty where you may still have most of the accoutrements of middle-class life. But your relationship with the financial elite has changed: you are indentured to the credit industry — for life

Fortune Magazine reports:

Wall Street strategist explains today’s political rage with a poverty line that should be $140,000 and the ‘Valley of Death’ trapping people below it

Analysts believe the election of Mamdani in New York City hingedo on the ‘affordability’ issue.

The feds report decent numbers — unemployment, inflation, GDP etc. But out on the street, it’s becoming more and more difficult for ordinary people to afford an ordinary life. On the surface, the reason for this is that an ‘ordinary’ has become much more expensive. Deeper down, the ‘ordinary’ life has become a trap.

So, when Mamdani proposed giveaways — lower rents, free transportation, childcare etc. — voters went for it.

The feds’ numbers don’t tell the real story. While people still have jobs…and places to live…the cost of an ‘ordinary’ life is much higher. And when you look at it through a realistic, street level lens, you see that millions of Americans are trapped. Michael Green calls it a ‘Valley of Death.’

The poverty line, he points out, was calculated in 1963 and defined as three times the cost of a minimum food diet.

Green:

‘The formula was developed by Mollie Orshansky, an economist at the Social Security Administration. In 1963, she observed that families spent roughly one-third of their income on groceries. Since pricing data was hard to come by for many items, e.g. housing, if you could calculate a minimum adequate food budget at the grocery store, you could multiply by three and establish a poverty line.’

That seemed like a pretty reasonable way to look at it — at the time. If people could cover their food with a third or less of their income, they would be free to spend the rest of their income as they pleased.

Trouble is, since 1963, ‘ordinary’ expenses have greatly expanded. Housing is now much more expensive. A typical house sells for $420,000. But the typical family can only qualify for a house costing less than $300,000.

And healthcare insurance barely existed in 1963. Blue Cross/Blue Shield cost families about $10 a month back then. Now you expect to pay about $600 a month on the ACA marketplace.

Childcare, too, is now regarded as a necessary expense. In 1963, mothers stayed home. In the ‘60s, too, we paid our tuition at the University of Maryland with a summer job. Now, tuition for in-state students is $11,000…out-of-state students pay $40,000.

And when you retired in the ‘60s, you had usually already paid off your mortgage and your car was yours, free and clear; with a modest pension and Social Security, you could be fine.

Today, food is only 5% to 7% of the typical family budget. Housing now costs 40%. Healthcare is about 20%. And for young families with children, childcare takes another 20% or more.

This leaves us with a whole different calculation of the poverty line. Green:

If you measured income inadequacy today the way Orshansky measured it in 1963, the threshold for a family of four wouldn’t be $31,200. It would be somewhere between $130,000 and $150,000.

Green lays out the math, beginning with the average ‘ordinary’ costs per family:

  • Childcare: $32,773
  • Housing: $23,267
  • Food: $14,717
  • Transportation: $14,828
  • Healthcare: $10,567
  • Other essentials: $21,857
  • Required net income: $118,009
  • Add federal, state, and FICA taxes of roughly $18,500, and you arrive at a required gross income of $136,500.

Everything not subject to import competition got marked up – childcare, tuition, healthcare…and housing.

And then, in the modern world you need to stay connected – to your work and your family. In 1955, says Green, the cost of ‘participation’ in modern life was $5 a month for a landline telephone. Now, you will need broadband and a smartphone. Expect to pay $200 a month, he says.

Of course, it varies with location. In some parts of the country — San Francisco or New York, for example — you would need more than that. In Arkansas and Mississippi, maybe substantially less.

But Green is describing more than just a new calculation. He’s talking about a new form of misery.’ It’s a poverty where you may still have most of the accoutrements of middle-class life. But your relationship with the financial elite has changed: you are indentured to the credit industry — for life.

When the children get older, they may go to college. As explained by the above math, relatively few families are able to save enough to pay the tuition. So, they borrow.

And the kids come out of school facing a lifetime indenture — first for tuition, then for cars… next for housing…and then for the rest of the necessaries of an ‘ordinary’ life. They will spend their whole adult lives trudging through the Valley of Death…and may never get to the other side.

More to come…

Regards,

Bill Bonner,
For Fat Tail Daily

All advice is general advice and has not taken into account your personal circumstances.

Please seek independent financial advice regarding your own situation, or if in doubt about the suitability of an investment.

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
guest
4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bill Bonner

Bill’s Premium Subscriptions

Publication logo
Fat Tail Investment Research

Latest Articles

  • Copper’s Christmas Breakout and a New Stock Idea
    By Murray Dawes

    Hopes for a Santa rally are building as the S&P 500 and Nasdaq just confirmed a weekly buy pivot, with odds of a US rate cut now close to 100%. In today’s Closing Bell, we look at how powerful these weekly trends can be.

  • The Problem with Exponentials
    By Charlie Ormond

    The difference between AI that can reliably handle two-hour tasks and AI that can handle multi-week tasks isn't just more capacity. It's a fundamentally different economic reality.

  • Get ready! Mainstream investors are going for gold
    By Brian Chu

    With gold setting records this year, precious metals assets, like mining stocks, are gaining attention. Even mainstream media is talking about them. But it’s not a flattering discussion. Here’s my take on the flaws in their case.

Primary Sidebar

Latest Articles

  • Copper’s Christmas Breakout and a New Stock Idea
  • The Problem with Exponentials
  • Get ready! Mainstream investors are going for gold
  • Banks Down, Miners Up: The easiest 5-10 year trade on the ASX
  • The Geologist’s Guide to Spotting Tomorrow’s Takeover Targets in Mining

Footer

Fat Tail Daily Logo
YouTube
Facebook
x (formally twitter)
LinkedIn

About

Investment ideas from the edge of the bell curve.

Go beyond conventional investing strategies with unique ideas and actionable opportunities. Our expert editors deliver conviction-led insights to guide your financial journey.

Quick Links

Subscribe

About

FAQ

Terms and Conditions

Financial Services Guide

Privacy Policy

Get in Touch

Contact Us

Email: support@fattail.com.au

Phone: 1300 667 481

All advice is general in nature and has not taken into account your personal circumstances. Please seek independent financial advice regarding your own situation, or if in doubt about the suitability of an investment.

The value of any investment and the income derived from it can go down as well as up. Never invest more than you can afford to lose and keep in mind the ultimate risk is that you can lose whatever you’ve invested. While useful for detecting patterns, the past is not a guide to future performance. Some figures contained in our reports are forecasts and may not be a reliable indicator of future results. Any actual or potential gains in these reports may not include taxes, brokerage commissions, or associated fees.

Fat Tail Logo

Fat Tail Daily is brought to you by the team at Fat Tail Investment Research

Copyright © 2025 Fat Tail Daily | ACN: 117 765 009 / ABN: 33 117 765 009 / ASFL: 323 988