• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Fat Tail Daily

Investment Ideas From the Edge of the Bell Curve

  • Menu
    • Commodities
      • Resources and Mining
      • Copper
      • Gold
      • Iron Ore
      • Lithium
      • Silver
      • Graphite
      • Rare Earths
    • Technology
      • AI
      • Bitcoin
      • Cryptocurrency
      • Energy
      • Financial Technology
      • Bio Technology
    • Market Analysis
      • Latest ASX News
      • Dividend Shares
      • ETFs
      • Stocks and Bonds
    • Macro
      • Australian Economy
      • Central Banks
      • World Markets
    • Small Caps
    • More
      • Investment Guides
      • Premium Research
      • Editors
      • About
      • Contact Us
  • Latest
  • Fat Tail Series
  • About Us
Macro Central Banks

A Nightmare Scenario

Like 0

By Bill Bonner, Tuesday, 17 May 2022

Atrocities are punished in the private sector. That’s what bear markets are for. In the public sector, they’re more often rewarded.

Gizmodo reports: ‘Tether Sinks Below $1 in Nightmare Scenario for Bitcoin’s Future’.

‘The cryptocurrency market continued to hemorrhage money Thursday, with the most popular coins down double-digit percentages over the past 24 hours. And absolutely no one knows when things will bottom out, with many people worried the entire market of fake digital money could go to zero as the stablecoin Tether officially traded below $1 for the first time ever early Thursday.

‘Bitcoin, the most popular cryptocurrency in the world, is down 11.2% over the past day, currently sitting at $27,959 — roughly 58% lower than its all-time high of $69,000 in mid-November. Ethereum has struggled even worse in the past 24 hours, down 19.9% to a price of $1,930.’

Cryptos may or may not be the future of money. But we saw yesterday that when the money goes, everything goes. As the feds diddled the dollar…it was hard to know what anything was really worth.

But now, like soldiers leaving a ruined city, the Fed is in retreat. And Mr Market discovers atrocities.

One of the leading meme stocks, for example, was AMC…a well-known chain of movie theatres. It was trading at US$10 a year ago. Now, after blasting up to nearly US$60 in June of last year, it’s back to US$10.

GameStop, another meme favourite, went above US$300 back in January 2021. It’s now in the US$80s. And if symmetry rules as we think it does, the company will be back at less than US$5 soon.

They that did ride most high do lie most low…

Bankman…fried?

Crypto billionaire Sam Bankman-Fried has seen his wealth cut in half…so far.

Also riding high in the saddle was Cathie Wood’s Ark fund. It’s down about 75% from its high. And poor Ms Wood; a press photo shows her hair has gone grey.

Atrocities are punished in the private sector. That’s what bear markets are for.

In the public sector, they’re more often rewarded.

Yes, today we continue our tour of the Incompetents Hall of Fame. There’s Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen. And generals David Petraeus, Stanley McChrystal, and Mark Milley. And, of course, Bush, Obama, Trump, and Biden.

Any one of these men might be fine in private life. Bush owned a baseball team. Obama might have made a perfectly good high school history teacher. Trump…a fast-and-loose real estate developer. And Biden? The man is an able hack and could fit into any organisation that needs one.

Instead, they were placed in charge of public policy…telling other people what to do…and each one made a disaster out of it. Why?

We’re just connecting the dots here.

How come Americans are getting poorer? How come GDP is falling?

How come public policies seem designed to fail? How come public officials act like morons?

What will the Fed do when the going really gets tough?

Today, let’s look at another arm of the ruling clique…the medical/pharmaceutical/health bureaucracy complex.

The COVID Games

In March 2020, it was obvious that a new plague was upon us. And there were two alternatives for how to deal with it.

The first was not to make a federal case of it, but just let ‘the people’ decide. This ‘bottom-up’ approach was taken by many poor countries…and by Sweden.

The Swedes were quickly labelled ‘anti-science’; Sweden was practically considered an outlaw state.

The other approach — top-down — was favoured by the ruling caste of almost all other developed countries. It involved lockdowns, masking, vaccines, and social distancing. ‘The science’, they said, required it. The idea was to stop the virus…to keep it from circulating so it couldn’t infect people.

Which approach worked better?

On the available evidence, the Swedes were right…our health officials turned out to be as incompetent at stopping COVID-19 as our Fed was at preventing inflation. The Week reports:

‘Sweden has one of Europe’s lowest Covid-19 death rates despite shunning most lockdown restrictions, new data released by the World Health Organization (WHO) suggests.

‘Stockholm chose not to implement a full national lockdown during the pandemic, instead relying on “voluntary changes to behaviour”, said The Telegraph. The decision meant the nation was “deemed almost to be a rogue state” as other countries introduced wide-ranging restrictions to stem the spread of the virus.

‘But according to the WHO figures, Sweden had an excess death rate of 56 per 100,000 — well below the global average of 96. By comparison, between 2020 and 2021, the UK’s excess death rate was 109, Spain’s was 111, and Germany’s was 116.

‘At the beginning of the pandemic, Sweden’s public health officials argued that it would “take years” to see which approaches to combating Covid-19 would be most effective, The Telegraph reported, arguing it would be better to avoid “untested measures”.

‘They also took into consideration the “collateral damage” of lockdown, such as “the missed cancer diagnoses, the cancelled hospital appointments, and the lost education”, the paper said. And the decision “appears to have been vindicated”.’

The Swedes’ approach was called the ‘light touch’. It meant leaving doctors and patients alone, letting them make their own decisions. But most of the world’s governments — advised by their health apparatchiks and pharmaceutical industries — chose the heavy touch.

Collateral damage

Dear readers will recognise the ‘heavy touch’; it was the path taken by the incompetents. The Bush administration, for example, after the Twin Towers attack of 9/11. Rather than allow the police and the judicial system to track down the perps and bring them to justice at minimal cost and little disruption, the Bush team invaded Iraq, which had nothing to do with the Twin Towers disaster.

The ‘heavy touch’ was also the route chosen by the Fed. In the mortgage finance crisis of ‘08–09, it didn’t stand back and let people work out their financial problems. In an honest economy, speculators who had made bad bets would have lost money…CEOs would have given up their bonuses…corporations would have gone bust.

Instead, the Fed bashed in the door like a team of ATF agents on a midnight raid. They dictated interest rates (below zero, inflation-adjusted)…funded the federal government’s ghastly ‘rescue’ plans…and rewarded reckless risk-taking.

Learning nothing from this episode, they repeated it in 2020–21…but on an even greater scale, with US$4 trillion in money printing in just 18 months, a new record.

And now, we are suffering the ‘collateral damage’.

Sweden tried to consider the ‘collateral damage’ done by COVID-fighting policies. But no one has yet attempted to plumb the depths of hurt caused by the combination of heavy-handed policies in both health and finance.

Tomorrow, we will take a stab at it.

Regards,

Dan Denning Signature

Bill Bonner,
For The Daily Reckoning Australia

All advice is general advice and has not taken into account your personal circumstances.

Please seek independent financial advice regarding your own situation, or if in doubt about the suitability of an investment.

Bill Bonner

Bill’s Premium Subscriptions

Publication logo
Fat Tail Investment Research

Latest Articles

  • Much Ado About Nothing
    By Charlie Ormond

    Art of the Deal or TACO is asking the wrong question. What should we all learn from this moment?

  • China Capitulation Part 2 – What western analysts miss about China
    By Brian Chu

    In this article of my China Capitulation series, I show where western analysts get it wrong about China’s outlook. I delve into how the Chinese Communist Party sets plans and reports the data to show you why you can’t trust their narrative…

  • The Great Rotation Begins: Following the Aussie Dollar Back to Commodities
    By James Cooper

    The Aussie Dollar hit historic lows in 2001 before a commodity supercycle erupted. Are we seeing that pattern repeat today?

Primary Sidebar

Latest Articles

  • Much Ado About Nothing
  • China Capitulation Part 2 – What western analysts miss about China
  • The Great Rotation Begins: Following the Aussie Dollar Back to Commodities
  • Bond Revolt in Japan, Trump Next?
  • The Game of Diplomacy: Trump’s Greenland Gambit

Footer

Fat Tail Daily Logo
YouTube
Facebook
x (formally twitter)
LinkedIn

About

Investment ideas from the edge of the bell curve.

Go beyond conventional investing strategies with unique ideas and actionable opportunities. Our expert editors deliver conviction-led insights to guide your financial journey.

Quick Links

Subscribe

About

FAQ

Terms and Conditions

Financial Services Guide

Privacy Policy

Get in Touch

Contact Us

Email: support@fattail.com.au

Phone: 1300 667 481

All advice is general in nature and has not taken into account your personal circumstances. Please seek independent financial advice regarding your own situation, or if in doubt about the suitability of an investment.

The value of any investment and the income derived from it can go down as well as up. Never invest more than you can afford to lose and keep in mind the ultimate risk is that you can lose whatever you’ve invested. While useful for detecting patterns, the past is not a guide to future performance. Some figures contained in our reports are forecasts and may not be a reliable indicator of future results. Any actual or potential gains in these reports may not include taxes, brokerage commissions, or associated fees.

Fat Tail Logo

Fat Tail Daily is brought to you by the team at Fat Tail Investment Research

Copyright © 2026 Fat Tail Daily | ACN: 117 765 009 / ABN: 33 117 765 009 / ASFL: 323 988