• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Fat Tail Daily

Investment Ideas From the Edge of the Bell Curve

  • Menu
    • Commodities
      • Resources and Mining
      • Copper
      • Gold
      • Iron Ore
      • Lithium
      • Silver
      • Graphite
      • Rare Earths
    • Technology
      • AI
      • Bitcoin
      • Cryptocurrency
      • Energy
      • Financial Technology
      • Bio Technology
    • Market Analysis
      • Latest ASX News
      • Dividend Shares
      • ETFs
      • Stocks and Bonds
    • Macro
      • Australian Economy
      • Central Banks
      • World Markets
    • Small Caps
    • More
      • Investment Guides
      • Premium Research
      • Editors
      • About
      • Contact Us
  • Latest
  • Fat Tail Series
  • About Us
Latest

The Easy Days of Lazy Growth are Behind Us

Like 0

By Vern Gowdie, Tuesday, 13 June 2023

During my entire life (which commenced in 1959), I have only ever known economic growth. Since the early 1960s, world economic growth has averaged 3.8% per annum. Those fortunate enough to be living in the developed world have enjoyed the lion’s share of the world’s economic bounty. However, will the generations coming after us boomers be able to say they’ve had a lifetime of continuous growth in the decades to come? Read on…

During my entire life (which commenced in 1959), I have only ever known economic growth.

Since the early 1960s, world economic growth has averaged 3.8% per annum.

Only two years out of 60-odd years have been negative…GFC and COVID.


annual GDP growth

Source: World Bank

[Click to open in a new window]

Those fortunate enough to be living in the developed world have enjoyed the lion’s share of the world’s economic bounty.

A trend spanning more than six decades pretty much becomes our accepted norm.

Individuals, businesses and governments make plans, policies and promises based on the trend continuing…indefinitely.

What has been will continue to be so.

Society has built certain expectations regarding employment opportunities, property values, retirement outcomes, education standards, security and the provision of healthcare and welfare.

Meeting those expectations (and in some cases, entitled demands) is entirely dependent upon the long-established growth trend resuming its annual 4% trajectory.

On the surface, 4% per annum seems like a reasonable number.

However, on a compound basis (using the Rule of 72) meeting that number would require the world economy to double in size every 18 years.

The math on this is daunting.

Global GDP is currently around US$100 trillion.

If trend growth was to resume, then in 2041, global GDP would be US$200 trillion. In 2059, US$400 trillion. In 2077, US$800 trillion. In 2095, US$1,600 trillion.

With population numbers having peaked in the developed and much of the developing world, where do the next big wave of credit-hungry borrowers and consumers come from?

The need for an ever-expanding base but fewer contributors…didn’t Bernie Madoff run one of those schemes?

Will the generations coming after us boomers be able to say they’ve had a lifetime of continuous growth in the decades to come?

I suspect not.

Trees don’t grow to the sky

Trees, we are told, do not grow to the sky. However, if you listen to economists and policymakers, economies apparently can go where trees cannot…to the sky and beyond.

Delivering on society’s considerable expectations has rendered the global economy and financial system hostage to growth…at any cost.

Past growth was largely a function of debt, demographics and falling interest rates.

What was, is not what’s going to be.

Debt levels are much higher.

Birth rates are much lower.

And interest rates (thanks to stubbornly high inflation) might just be in a secular (long-term) upward trend.

Future generations are facing a whole different set of circumstances to the ones my fellow boomers and I have lived through.

If we use the US economy as a proxy for the West, we see the past six decades of debt accumulation can be broken up into three distinct periods.


growth by sector

Source: FRED

[Click to open in a new window]

  1. Post-Second World War to 1980 — the ratio of Debt to GDP was in the 1.0 to 1.5 zone.
  2. 1980 to 2008 — the debt to GDP ratio steadily rises (due to falling interest rates) from 1.5 to over 3.5
  3. 2008 to present — debt to GDP has stagnated in the 3.5 to 4.0 zone. Adding more debt (as a % of GDP) is getting more difficult…even though for most of this period interest rates were suppressed.

There’s no doubt the addition of borrowed funds was a major contributor to economic growth.

But what was once a boost is now becoming a burden.

In the period when a dollar of debt delivered a dollar of economic output, US GDP was higher. Then, as the US economy was asked to shoulder more and more debt, the pace of growth slowed.

Servicing the considerable debt obligations is taking money away from consumption.


US GDP growth

Source: Macro Trends

[Click to open in a new window]

The global economy’s initial reliance on debt for growth — starting in 1980 — has become a relationship of full-blown dependency.

It is impossible for the GDP needle to move into the positive without a continued and exponential accumulation of debt.

Therein lies the problem we face.

Do we continue this path of economic self-sabotage OR take evasive action (albeit a little belatedly) to avoid a bad situation becoming worse?

Many promises will be broken

The problem for policymakers is that 2023 is not 1981.

We are not coming off a low debt base. Boomers are almost 40 years older and focused on retirement.

The highly competitive economic forces of China and India did not exist in 1981.

New-age technology and automation are transforming the world and the way we do business.

Central bankers and governments want a resumption of past growth trends…driven by the continued accumulation of debt. But which sectors are going to have the capacity to continue borrowing exponentially?

Households?

Corporates?

Well, those two sectors kind of go ‘hand-in-hand’. If households act with restraint, the corporate sector, faced with lacklustre demand, has less need to gear up.

Therefore, the burden of creating the illusion of GDP growth will fall onto governments.

Financing more and more unproductive initiatives.

But who is going to buy all this debt?

Will central banks — like the Bank of Japan have done — be the back-door financiers?

Probably. But, as Japan is now recognising, this fraud has a limited shelf life…then what?

Reality hits.

And the assumption of central bankers being the buyers of first resort assumes we still have central banks.

I can hear it now, ‘Don’t be stupid, of course there will be central banks’.

Probably, but not definitely.

When ‘The Everything Bubble’ finally busts and the wreckage caused by their idiotic policies is laid bare, central bankers will be about as popular as Donald Trump at a transgender rally.

Will political powerbrokers be able to withstand the public pressure to abandon the concept that a handful of out-of-touch academics know what’s best for us? Maybe. But I don’t rule out the possibility of the unexpected.

The easy days of lazy growth are behind us.

What lies ahead is a very rocky and treacherous road.

For my children and grandchildren, I wish it wasn’t so.

But the world we are going into is vastly different and more challenging than the one that boomers grew up in.

Things we have taken for granted — year-on-year growth, share and property markets always going up, indexed age pensions and first-world health systems — are under threat in our future.

Why so gloomy?

Simple. If something cannot continue, then it won’t.

Denying the truth of the maths won’t change the outcome.

To avoid being blindsided by what’s hiding in plain sight, be prepared for many promises to be broken.

We are at a dangerous point in the market cycle — when risks and valuations are high and fear levels are low. We’ve been here before and it does not end well.

Retention of capital should be your priority.

Sixty years of growth bestowed upon society a misguided sense of stability.

It’s timely to remember the words of famed economist Hyman Minsky, ‘stability breeds instability’.

In the coming years, I think we’re going to rediscover just how true Minsky’s words were.

Regards,

Vern Gowdie Signature

Vern Gowdie,
Editor, The Daily Reckoning Australia

All advice is general advice and has not taken into account your personal circumstances.

Please seek independent financial advice regarding your own situation, or if in doubt about the suitability of an investment.

Vern Gowdie

Vern’s Premium Subscriptions

Publication logo
Fat Tail Investment Research

Latest Articles

  • Just “ChatGPT It”, Stupid
    By Callum Newman

    Over in the USA, former fund manager Whitney Tilson remains staunch that Alphabet is a good buy. But it’s core business of search is under threat after looking unbreachable for years. Why? You can guess: AI.

  • The blunder that cost Australia $28 billion
    By Brian Chu

    On 9th May, Australia lost a pioneer in the precious metals industry, Don Mackay-Coghill. As a friend and mentor, he shared many valuable insights with me. This one was memorable…

  • Lion Clock says buy now for the big pay off later
    By Callum Newman

    Now is the time to be investing and following into this sector. According to the Lion investment clock, now’s the time to scoop up what you can and surf the rising liquidity wave.

Primary Sidebar

Latest Articles

  • Just “ChatGPT It”, Stupid
  • The blunder that cost Australia $28 billion
  • Lion Clock says buy now for the big pay off later
  • Cashflow Gems: Focus on Mining Juniors That Own the Golden Goose
  • Tick, tock: there’s a boom brewing in one sector…

Footer

Fat Tail Daily Logo
YouTube
Facebook
x (formally twitter)
LinkedIn

About

Investment ideas from the edge of the bell curve.

Go beyond conventional investing strategies with unique ideas and actionable opportunities. Our expert editors deliver conviction-led insights to guide your financial journey.

Quick Links

Subscribe

About

FAQ

Terms and Conditions

Financial Services Guide

Privacy Policy

Get in Touch

Contact Us

Email: support@fattail.com.au

Phone: 1300 667 481

All advice is general in nature and has not taken into account your personal circumstances. Please seek independent financial advice regarding your own situation, or if in doubt about the suitability of an investment.

The value of any investment and the income derived from it can go down as well as up. Never invest more than you can afford to lose and keep in mind the ultimate risk is that you can lose whatever you’ve invested. While useful for detecting patterns, the past is not a guide to future performance. Some figures contained in our reports are forecasts and may not be a reliable indicator of future results. Any actual or potential gains in these reports may not include taxes, brokerage commissions, or associated fees.

Fat Tail Logo

Fat Tail Daily is brought to you by the team at Fat Tail Investment Research

Copyright © 2025 Fat Tail Daily | ACN: 117 765 009 / ABN: 33 117 765 009 / ASFL: 323 988